Sciencespeaking topic
The theory-ladenness of observation: two scientists looking at the same image, holding different theories, see different things. Is there really such a thing as neutral observation?
— Norwood Russell Hanson, the theory-ladenness of observation
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- Prospect theory: why does the pain of losing 100 dollars feel greater than the joy of gaining 100? Do we make decisions based on absolute outcomes, or relative to a reference point?
- A tree stores more and more carbon as it ages, but when it finally dies and rots it gives it all back. So nothing is permanent; it was only borrowed. In nature, is owning actually a matter of holding something in trust?
- A rumor, a fashion, a revolution affects no one for a long time; then once a critical number of people adopt it, it spreads to everyone at once. Behind that 'all at once' there's a mathematical threshold. Why do ideas behave like viruses, and why does most of them never catch on?
- An amputated arm can still ache, and even itch, as if it were there; this is called phantom limb. The brain insistently feels a body that no longer exists. Where is the boundary of your body: in your flesh, or in the map inside your brain?
- Sleep and memory consolidation: what we learn during the day is made permanent in sleep as it transfers from the hippocampus to the cortex. So does pulling an all-nighter before an exam actually stop us from saving what we learned?