Sciencespeaking topic
P-hacking: analyzing the data different ways until a significant result appears. Why can we still be suspicious of a result even when it comes out statistically significant?
— p-hacking, manipulation of the p-value
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- What evidence does the Big Bang theory rest on for the idea that the universe had a beginning?
- Meditation and brain change: Davidson showed that long-term meditators have physically altered regions for attention and emotion. If training the mind is like training a muscle, can our way of thinking rebuild our brain?
- If we know exactly where an electron is, we can never know how fast it's moving. This isn't a shortcoming in measurement, it's nature's own rule. Why did the universe choose to be 'uncertain' at its deepest level?
- Why does the second law of thermodynamics, with entropy always increasing, give time a direction?
- Memory reconsolidation: Nader showed that each time we recall a memory it briefly becomes fluid and is re-saved. If we alter a memory a little every time we recall it, is our past really fixed?