Historyspeaking topic
What defeated Napoleon's army in Russia was probably less the Russian soldiers than the cold and the lice likely carrying typhus; wars have often been won by microbes, not generals. If history books celebrate heroic commanders while the real victor was so often an invisible organism, how long can the 'great men make history' narrative stand?
— The Russian campaign and typhus, disease and war
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- How did Vesalius's De humani corporis fabrica, in which he dissected and drew the human body himself, shake medical authority in the Renaissance?
- We are taught that medieval people believed the Earth was flat, yet educated Europeans had known it was round since ancient Greece; the 'flat earth myth' is actually a story invented in the 19th century. What does our need to portray the past as 'dumber than us' confess about ourselves?
- Was the era when Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived side by side in al-Andalus (the Iberian Peninsula) truly an 'age of tolerance'? Let's talk about this debate.
- Colors were not fixed throughout history: the word 'blue' barely appears in ancient Greek texts, and the sea is described as 'wine-dark'; unable to name the color, perhaps they could not fully 'see' it. If words can shape the world we see this much, it makes you wonder what we are failing to notice today simply because we have no name for it.
- The pyramids were built not by slaves but largely by paid workers fed on bread and beer, whose tombs were laid out with care; the image of 'slaves under the whip' comes mostly from Hollywood and old prejudice. Whether we imagine a monument built 'by tyranny or by organized labor,' aren't we just projecting our own era's idea of work onto the past?