Philosophyspeaking topic
Utilitarianism: should the greatest happiness of the greatest number be our measure? If one person's suffering can be traded for the majority's happiness, what happens to justice?
— Jeremy Bentham & John Stuart Mill, utilitarianism
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- Rawls's veil of ignorance: if you had to design society without knowing your own wealth, gender, or talents, what kind of order would you build? Why does defining justice require forgetting who we are?
- Hell is other people.
- Effective altruism: is doing good about good intentions, or about producing the most measurable benefit? Should we prefer the emotional donation or the cold calculation that saves more lives?
- What measuring stick do you use to judge your own life?
- Is beauty objective or subjective?