Sciencespeaking topic
Underdetermination: more than one theory can explain the same data equally well. If the data doesn't tell us which is correct, on what basis do we choose between them?
— the Duhem-Quine thesis, underdetermination
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- A coral reef is not a single creature but the shared skeleton of billions of tiny animals; even after they all die the stone remains and new ones settle on top. Is this how cities are built too, on the skeletons the dead leave behind?
- Logical positivism: for the Vienna Circle, the only meaningful statements are those verifiable by experience. Applied to itself the criterion collapses; is only the verifiable is meaningful itself verifiable?
- Present bias: why do we prefer a small reward today over a bigger reward tomorrow? Why do we keep putting off our better self to next Monday?
- Why was Galileo's telescopic discovery of Jupiter's four moons considered a blow to the Ptolemaic model of the universe?
- In a forest, if you let small fires happen, a huge fire never breaks out; if you suppress them all for years, one day everything burns at once. The same holds for financial crises. Why does preventing small disasters sometimes guarantee the big one?