Sciencespeaking topic
The no-miracles argument: if science works this well, it would be an enormous coincidence for its theories not to reflect reality. Is working the same thing as being true?
— Hilary Putnam, the no-miracles argument (scientific realism)
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- Babies are born with about 300 bones, adults have 206; so as we grow we don't gain bones, we fuse and lose some. Growing up isn't always 'adding'; sometimes maturing means separate parts fusing together.
- Two bird species live in the same tree, but one feeds only on the upper branches and the other below; instead of fighting, they've divided the tree. Does peace sometimes come not from agreement but from using the same resource differently?
- A slime mold, a single-celled yellow blob with no brain, finds the shortest path through a maze and even draws networks as efficient as a city's subway map. Is a brain really necessary for intelligence?
- Money is really nothing; you can't eat it or drink it. The only reason it's valuable is that everyone believes it's valuable. So it works because we all believe together in a shared illusion. How does such a fragile 'shared belief' stay standing more firmly than bridges and armies?
- If everyone starts saving so the economy will grow, the economy collapses because no one is spending, and everyone ends up poorer. Behavior that is wise one by one becomes catastrophic all together. Why can individual virtue turn into a collective trap?