Sciencespeaking topic
Peer review: a study is filtered by experts in the field before publication. But if reviewers are human and carry the same biases, how reliable a quality guarantee is this filter?
— peer review
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- A flock of birds turns in the sky as if it were a single living thing, yet no one calls out 'turn.' Each bird only watches the six or seven birds beside it. How does such a magnificent whole emerge from simple local rules?
- A particle that can be in two places at once 'decides' on a single place the moment you look at it. Looking changes the outcome. If we weren't observing, would the universe remain uncertain?
- A locust on its own is shy and harmless, but when it becomes crowded its body and brain change and it turns into part of a destructive swarm. How does the same creature become an utterly different being because of crowding?
- The raven paradox: saying all ravens are black is logically equivalent to saying everything non-black is not a raven. Does seeing a green apple really confirm the claim about ravens?
- In experiments on mice, when the gut bacteria of a bold mouse are transferred to a timid one, the timid mouse can become bolder. Is personality something that can be carried by microbes? Is what we call courage a matter of character, or of flora?