General Knowledgespeaking topic
Natural or synthetic? 'Natural' is not automatically safe (arsenic is natural too), while synthetic is controlled and consistent. Why does the appeal-to-nature fallacy mislead us so easily?
— the appeal to nature fallacy
practice with this topic
Set the timer (5-30 min), take 20 seconds of prep if you like, start talking. Jot your thoughts onto the sticky-note board.
similar topics
- How did the arrival of perspective in painting, from the Renaissance onward, change the way we see? Let's talk about the illusion of depth as an 'invention.'
- Why did the invention of photography liberate painting? Once the burden of recording reality was lifted, let's talk about why painters turned toward abstraction.
- Hot peppers are not actually hot; capsaicin does no damage to tissue, it merely tricks the nerves that sense temperature, so the brain thinks 'I am burning.' Humans seek out this fake pain for pleasure even though we know there is no real danger. Why are we the only creature on Earth that deliberately inflicts counterfeit pain on itself?
- The lunar calendar is about eleven days shorter than the solar one, which is why Ramadan drifts through every season over the years; it is observed in winter and in summer alike. Some peoples tied time to the Moon, others to the Sun. If humanity chose two different clocks in the sky, which one keeps the 'true' time?
- When the tomato arrived in Europe it was believed poisonous for two hundred years, because the wealthy ate off pewter plates laced with lead and the acid leached the lead out; the tomato took the blame. The very symbol of Italian cuisine was once eaten in fear, if at all. Is a food's reputation decided by its truth or by its gossip?